Hang Out and Post

[Kuroida]

wow what happened? I'm gone for a day and the new ppl threads sky rocket o.0

 

And anyone home? No one's posted for like 4 hrs....

[Revenge]

Which is ironic because I was at a bus station. :mellow:

[Kuroida]

Great, When someone shows up I have to go to bed (it's almost 3 am) o.o

 

Good night and hope someone else shows up soon....unless you've already left...

[CAV of Gang Green]

Ryan gets the biggest one though. :P

 

Quit tempting me to say it. Cause I will.

[jumpingbeans]

Are we talking about cookies AGAIN!!??

Why can't we talk about chips?

[CAV of Gang Green]

No, how about we break Larua's Law period.

 

Let's talk about sunrises, since the sun rose an hour and a half ago here in NY.

 

Sunrises are awesome.

[jumpingbeans]

I like sunrises too, but what's Larua's Law period?

[CAV of Gang Green]

Larua's Law is the law of TDN, in which no matter the topic, it will always lead to a food topic.

 

I will not go look for the true definition, for I don't want to go sifting through my posts (yes I defined and named the law).

 

Frankly, I'm tired of talking about food, so I want to stop food topics.

[Revenge]

(yes I made and named the law).

 

No you didn't. :angry: Not even close, that's complete bull. Noog's the one who first mentioned it, and the name was thought up by members of the IC. You're actually the only one who doesn't like it. What's your problem?

[CAV of Gang Green]

No you didn't. :angry: Not even close, that's complete bull. Noog's the one who first mentioned it, and the name was thought up by members of the IC. You're actually the only one who doesn't like it. What's your problem?

 

Actually, they mentioned the law. I wrote a definition and posted it. It was originally named Livvy's Law. However, they all agreed that it should be named Larua's Law instead, so I edited the post. Do I need to show you proof?

[Unstream]

Actually, I think Jhon's right. Especially because it was talked about first on the IC message thread before we brought it up on the forum.

 

And just because you took the idea and "defined" it doesn't mean you came up with it. It's like rewording Newton's laws of motion and saying I came up with it.

[CAV of Gang Green]

And just because you took the idea and "defined" it doesn't mean you came up with it. It's like rewording Newton's laws of motion and saying I came up with it.

 

Last I checked, no one mentioned it. And we were talking about making a law that had to do with food topics. I defined it, and coined the name. They voted to change the name from Livvy's Law to Larua's Law, and I changed the name.

 

But then again, what does it matter what I say? I'm always wrong.

[Divya Bean]

I was reading above posts and Revenge, you were at the bus station for 4 hours? :mellow:

 

And I think that it is funny how Laura's Law was compared to Newton's Law. It is not funny if it is going to be used against someone. :sad02:

[CAV of Gang Green]

And I think that it is funny how Laura's Law was compared to Newton's Law. :laughingsmiley:

 

Yeah, Will. If you want your arguement to be more valid, don't compare a fake law on TDN to the laws of physics.

[Divya Bean]

Nonononono! That isnt what I was saying! I just thought it was funny! Please dont use my comment as a new weapon! :sad01_anim:

[-Ryan]

Quick Divya! Delete the evidence! xD

 

CAV might get mad though. :whistle:

[Divya Bean]

Hi Ryan!!!!! And good idea...just a sec. I will do that slashy thing. :yes:

[jumpingbeans]

I am sooooooooo confused here.

But I like how we got science(Newton's laws) in here.

[Unstream]

Haha I was just saying that rewording a law doesn't make it yours. And I'm a big fan of Newton :D

 

If only he could've written the laws of thermodynamics too... :P

[jumpingbeans]

I'm going to attempt to reword the laws of Newton my memory. Here goes:

One:

When stopped, and object won't go

Two:

Unless pushed by another moving object.

Three:

Unless the moving object isn't moving enough.

 

So, did I get a C, at the least? :)

[CAV of Gang Green]

Nonononono! That isnt what I was saying! I just thought it was funny! Please dont use my comment as a new weapon! :sad01_anim:

 

*loads post into sub machine gun*

 

CAV might get mad though. :whistle:

 

RYAN, PUT THE POST BACK INTO THE CONVO!

 

Haha I was just saying that rewording a law doesn't make it yours.

 

Ok then. No problem with you.

 

But Jhon took it as if I was stealing the law. Why would I steal a law? I'd rather make my own. Which reminds me

 

Divya's Law

 

In the event that Divya Bean posts, the person below her must dance.

 

Just a random thought.

[jumpingbeans]

No.

Divya's Law:

In the event that Divya Bean Posts, I get a million dollars!

I like that one better :yes:

[CAV of Gang Green]

No.

Divya's Law:

In the event that Divya Bean Posts, I get a million dollars!

I like that one better :yes:

 

I don't know. I think that comes out a little self centered.

[Unstream]

Eh, well you got the first one, kinda.

First law: An object stays in a state of rest or uniform motion if not acted upon by an external force.

Second law: Essentially the equation F=ma

Third law: Every action has an equal and opposite reaction (i.e. I push all wall with a force of "F", and it "pushes" back -F).

 

No CAV, we just didn't like how you claimed credit for a law that wasn't yours.

[CAV of Gang Green]

No CAV, we just didn't like how you claimed credit for a law that wasn't yours.

 

1. If a law was mine, it would be CAV's Law. There is no such thing, since I can't create a law based on my own, that is self centered.

2. When and how did I claim credit? I simply said that I defined the law.