Chipmonker Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences. -- Wiki The debate over the death penalty is trying to determine whether or not the execution of a criminal is ever justified, and, if so under what circumstances it is allowable. There are many pros and cons to the death penalty Ex. Pros of DP Certain murderers deserve nothing more than a just, proportionate and effective form of punishment. It's 100% effective; that killer cannot commit any more crimes. DP may act as a deterrent against more crime. Ex. Cons of DP 'An Eye for and Eye' is abhorrent thought; it is degrading to human integrity. By executing criminals you are ruling out the possibility of rehabilitation. Capital punishment costs more than life without parole. So what does TDN think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lutarist Jake Posted May 1, 2007 Share Posted May 1, 2007 I strongly don't think so. You're throwing away a criminal's life! Two wrongs don't make a right! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chipmonker Posted May 6, 2007 Author Share Posted May 6, 2007 I agree with you there on that. It's just not worth it. Even though I do disagree on some of the cons of the DP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lutarist Jake Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 By the way, what's parole? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chipmonker Posted May 12, 2007 Author Share Posted May 12, 2007 In America, it is the supervised release of a prisoner from prision before he/she completed the sentence. The prisoner usually has to meet some standard of X% of sentence served, have "good behavior" and agree to get a job / follow the law / get a home after being released. In theory it rehabilitates convicted fellons. It differs in reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lutarist Jake Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 Can they cart the criminal back to the slammer if he misbehaves? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 RE Jake: Yes, it's all supervised. In my opinion, a government totally contradicts itself if it allows the killing of another because of their actions. It's just ridiculous. Whatever a person has done, they do not deserve their life to be taken away. Five minutes of insanity does not give you the right to take away the next thirty, forty years of someone's life. Who are we to decide the fate of someone's life? We're in a position to decide the legislation over whether or not a person should be able to kill or not, sure, but we shouldn't punish this with plain murder. There are some pretty cruel events that would make me stop and think whether or not we should terminate life, but it's only a moment before the thought passes. Besides, a person who is sent to prison for forty years, the first three of which are in total solitary confinement, is sure to be a bigger punishment and the person would actually feel punished for their actions. They'd still have some sort of a life. Everyone deserves a decent quality of life, despite their actions; whether it's controlled, in prison, or as a free man. We do not have the right to kill another person because of their actions, and if the UK would even think about reintroducing the ludricrous death penalty, I'd be one of the many millions in protest. </strongwords> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellie_Penguin Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 I think the reason they kill is so that the murderers won't have a chance to appeal and reduce their sentence for "good behavior" or such. I agree with Sam, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lutarist Jake Posted May 15, 2007 Share Posted May 15, 2007 Of course! That's thexcuse they keep using! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kikaown Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 Yeah, many murderers worm their way back out of prison through 'good behavior' or 'rehabilitation'. That's one reason we should have a death penalty. To Sam, you mentioned 'five minutes of insanity'. That applies to some people, but what about those who spend years planning a murder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellie_Penguin Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 I think instead of killing them, they should pass a law so that those who are sentenced for life, should NOT get to appeal no matter what. For all we know, those murderers could actually be planning something. They're mentally ill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lutarist Jake Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 How about putting them in a mental hospital? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chipmonker Posted May 27, 2007 Author Share Posted May 27, 2007 And who would pay for that? The tax payers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts