Portugal's prime minister said he will enact more liberal abortion laws in the conservative Roman Catholic country even though his proposal to relax restrictions failed to win complete endorsement in a referendum.

 

With nearly all the votes counted, almost 60 percent of voters approved the referendum allowing women to opt for abortions up to the 10th week of pregnancy, while slightly more than 40 percent opposed it.

 

However, under Portuguese law more than 50 percent of the country's 8.9 million registered voters must participate in a referendum to make the ballot valid. The turnout Sunday was 44 percent.

 

Prime Minister Jose Socrates, leader of the center-left Socialist Party, said he would stick to his pre-ballot pledge to change the law through parliament where his party holds an overwhelming majority.

 

"Portugal will now tackle abortion in the same way as most other developed European countries," Socrates said. Women seeking an abortion will first go through counseling "so that the decision is a considered one, not taken out of desperation," he said.

 

It could still be some time, however, before the law is changed. A bill would have to be voted on first in parliament and then go to the president for approval. It would come into force only when the new legislation is published in the public records -- a procedure that usually takes several months.

 

Debate over the abortion law, one of the most restrictive in the European Union, pitted the Socialist government against conservative parties and the Catholic Church, which claims more than 90 percent of Portuguese as followers.

 

Under current law, the procedure is allowed only in cases of rape, fetal malformation or if a mother's health is in danger, and only in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.

 

In most other EU nations, abortion is permitted within much broader limits. Women can ask for abortions up to the 24th week of pregnancy in Britain and up to the 12th week in Germany, France and Italy.

 

Church officials made no immediate comment on the referendum.

 

Luis Marques Mendes, leader of the main opposition Social Democratic Party, said he would not stand in the way of granting broader abortion rights despite his opposition during the referendum campaign.

 

"Even though the (referendum) result is not binding, we believe it should be democratically respected," he said.

 

It was the second time in less than 10 years that a referendum on the deeply divisive issue failed to draw enough voters in Portugal. In 1998, a majority of voters rejected a similar proposal; the referendum was declared void because of a low turnout, and Portugal's policy remained unchanged.

 

Socrates, whose party took power in a landslide victory almost two years ago after he promised broad reforms and national modernization, described Portugal's current law as "backward."

 

Joao Paulo Malta, an anti-abortion activist, said the low turnout showed the majority had not spoken clearly and that voters remain divided.

 

One voter, Carlos Sousa, 56, condemned the existing legislation Sunday: "It's a bad law, not suited to our society."

 

But Maria Candida Duarte, 72, said she wanted to keep the strict policies in place.

 

"It's imperative to maintain our position. A child has a right to life -- from conception," she said.

 

The current law merely drives abortion underground, Socrates said. Women seeking to terminate their pregnancies travel to EU countries where it is legal, especially to private clinics across the border in Spain where abortion is permitted on psychological grounds, or resort to shady, back-alley clinics at home.

 

Abortion rights activists say about 10,000 women are hospitalized every year with complications arising from botched, illegal abortions.

 

Now my question is: Do you agree that this is necessary for the country's development or is it just another wrong step?

Um, why are there two topics on this?

Um, why are there two topics on this?

 

I accidentally clicked the Submit button twice. I asked Chipmonker to delete it, but he isn't online yet.

 

Edit: Ok, thanks for deleting it. :)

Someone else got to the moding first. x_x

 

Anyway, due to the past records of this debate topic (abortion) -

THIS TOPIC WILL BE UNDER HEAVY SCRUNTINY AT ALL TIMES

 

Take note that I didn't even think about closing this topic because no rule has been broken and I respect all of TDN's users. However you all have been forewarned!

 

This post has been close by a member of staff (Chipmonker) because of this thread's old age!

PM me, Chipmonker, to have it reopened and/or for any other mod-ish duty.

 

Boy, did I kill this topic fast >.<